云顶彩票注册网_平台推荐官方版v2.9.1(2023已更新)

来源：云顶彩票手机版2024-05-10 17:48

云顶彩票注册网

为劳动放歌！“中国梦·劳动美”新年音乐会举办******

　　光明网讯（记者邱晓琴）辞旧迎新之时，12月26日晚，由全总文工团主办的“中国梦·劳动美”2023新年交响音乐会在中央歌剧院举办。音乐会由全总文工团常务副团长兼艺术总监、著名女高音歌唱家陈思思领衔担纲，特邀北京电视台主持人春妮、陈竞担任主持，青年指挥家孙莹执棒。著名歌唱家丁毅及青年歌唱家李爽、郭橙橙、于海洋等加盟演唱，全总文工团独唱演员杨竹青、马晓梦、李金点等盛装上阵。

为劳动放歌！“中国梦·劳动美”新年音乐会举办

音乐会现场侯梦阳、王薇/供图

　　音乐会以宏伟而抒情的管弦乐作品《红旗颂》作为开场序曲，分“奋进新征程”和“礼赞新时代”上、下两个篇章，时长近100分钟。

　　陈思思介绍，演出以管弦乐，混声合唱，四重唱，二重唱，独唱、表演唱等多种形式呈现，不仅囊括了多首脍炙人口的经典乐曲、歌曲，还展示了全总文工团原创作品《中国梦·劳动美》《敢闯才会赢》，以及“庆祝二十大建功新时代”全国企行业歌曲、职工舞蹈、职工曲艺小品征集展演活动中脱颖而出的优秀获奖歌曲《从小李到老李》《同心圆》等，交响乐团、合唱团和歌手们的共同演绎，营造了喜庆二十大的浓郁氛围，为观众带来了听觉和视觉的享受。

　　尾声为一曲豪迈铿锵的大合唱《亿万职工心向党》。陈思思说：“亿万职工心向党，让我们万众一心，奋进新征程、礼赞新时代！”

为劳动放歌！“中国梦·劳动美”新年音乐会举办

音乐会现场侯梦阳、王薇/供图

　　音乐会总监制、全总文工团党委书记、团长钱磊介绍，乐曲悠扬、歌喉动人，不但吟咏着对祖国的热爱、对工作与生活的激情，更是用歌声贺岁，为劳动放歌，唱响新时代的主旋律，满怀豪情向奋战在各行各业各条战线的劳动者，致以崇高敬意和美好的新年祝福。

　　“光荣属于劳动者，幸福属于劳动者！我们以音乐盛会的艺术形式，送来全总领导及各级工会组织对大家的关心与问候，真诚慰问一直坚守和奋战在一线的职工群众和广大劳动者，向大家道一声，你们辛苦了！祝愿大家在新的一年里身体健康，工作顺利，阖家幸福，吉祥安康。”钱磊说。

　　全总文工团成立于1956年，是中国工会系统唯一的国家级综合性专业文艺院团。“中国梦·劳动美”主题新年交响音乐会作为全总文工团一个独特的文艺品牌，每到岁末之际，以文艺的形式致敬广大劳动者，致敬一年来奋战在各行各业各条战线的职工群众和广大劳动者，在优美绝伦的音乐与昂扬向上的歌声中迎接崭新一年，至今已成功举办六届。

中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******

　　中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。

资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。

　　2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。

　　日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。

　　日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。

　　事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。

　　因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。

　　日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。

　　《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。

　　德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。

　　日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。

　　国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。

　　太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。

　　Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business

　　By John Lee

　　(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.

　　Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.

　　The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.

　　On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.

　　The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.

　　In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.

　　Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.

　　The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.

　　The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.

　　The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.

　　According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.

　　As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.

　　However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.

　　Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.

　　The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.

　　If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.